Skip to content
Parikh AdvisoryLogic Before Code

Our approach

Logic Before Code

Don’t start with the solution.

Every business challenge has options. Before you build something new, we help you understand what really needs to change—and choose the right next step.

Before the investmentPut the decision on the table.
A decision table, before the investmentTwo people examine evidence, a marked-up brief and alternative product models at a shared decision table.AlternativesEvidenceTrade-offs
Improve what existsBuild something newSimplify how work happensValidate before investing
The useful next step depends on what we discover.

01

The problem behind the problem

The initial request is often a symptom, not the real issue. We dig deeper to understand what’s actually happening—across people, processes, data and customers.

Follow the causeThe request is visible. The cause may be elsewhere.
The screen is only the visible symptomA mobile booking screen is examined alongside three backstage possibilities: missing information, unclear ownership and disconnected systems. These are questions, not a diagnosis.Book a visitChoose timeSubmit?Missing informationThe same data, requested twiceUnclear ownershipWho takes the next step?Disconnected systemsA handoff that never arrivesThe visible symptom
Missing information
The same data, requested twice.
Unclear ownership
Who takes the next step?
Disconnected systems
A handoff that never arrives.
Illustrative possibilities. Investigate before choosing a solution.

What we explore

  • Are customers struggling to book?
  • Is the sales team missing information?
  • Do existing systems not talk to each other?
  • Is the real issue a process or team capability?
  • Would a simpler solution work better?

02

A five-stage way of working

We follow a structured but flexible process. Not every engagement needs all five stages—we use what’s relevant to your situation.

Explore the stages ↓
A flexible processEach stage should move the decision forward.
  1. DiagnoseFrom request to evidence.
    01

    Diagnose

    Understand the real problem

    From request to evidence.
  2. PrioritiseMake the order explicit.
    02

    Prioritise

    Focus on what matters most

    Make the order explicit.
  3. DesignMake trade-offs visible.
    03

    Design

    Develop and compare options

    Make trade-offs visible.
  4. ExecutePut direction into practice.
    04

    Execute

    Support implementation

    Put direction into practice.
  5. ImproveLearn from what changes.
    05

    Improve

    Measure and refine

    Learn from what changes.
Use the stages your situation needs.
What happens at each stage?

1. Diagnose

Examine the request, available evidence and the people affected. Clarify the problem before defining the solution.

2. Prioritise

Compare the opportunities against the goals, constraints and dependencies. Choose where attention matters most.

3. Design

Develop realistic alternatives and make the trade-offs explicit. Agree what is worth testing or pursuing.

4. Execute

Help translate the direction into priorities, responsibilities and delivery decisions. The support depends on the engagement.

5. Improve

Review what changes in practice, test the assumptions and refine the next step as new evidence appears.

03

We look at the whole business

Product, technology, people and commercial decisions don’t exist in isolation. We examine how different parts of your business influence each other.

One connected businessFollow one decision across the business.
Customer need
Promise
Team handoff
Ownership
Business impact
Economics
  • Customers
  • Marketing & sales
  • Operations & processes
  • People & teams
  • Product & technology
  • Finance & commercial
Customer need
The promise made to the customer.
Team handoff
Who owns the work, and what happens next?
Business impact
What changes in the systems and economics?
A local change can create a consequence elsewhere.

04

How we make recommendations

We compare realistic options, consider trade-offs and recommend the approach that best fits your goals, constraints and context. There is no predetermined answer—it could be build, buy, improve or wait.

See an example ↓
Four legitimate directionsChoose the fit. Make the trade-off explicit.
BuildCreate something new

Build

Create something new

  • Right capabilities
  • Full control
  • Higher cost and risk
BuyUse an existing solution

Buy

Use an existing solution

  • Faster to implement
  • Lower development effort
  • May not fully fit your needs
ImproveMake targeted changes

Improve

Make targeted changes

  • Build on existing assets
  • Lower risk
  • May have limited impact
WaitValidate before investing

Wait

Validate before investing

  • Gather more evidence
  • Reduce risk
  • Opportunity cost to consider
There is no predetermined answer.

05

Human judgment, technology and AI

We use research, analytics, automation and AI where they add value. But understanding context, weighing trade-offs and making the final decision remains a human responsibility.

Human judgment stays in the loopTools can prepare the work. People must own the call.

Technology and AI
Faster analysis · Better insights · More options

Human judgment
Context and experience · Trade-off decisions · Accountability

Set the question · Context · Assisted analysis · Options · Review the work · Accountability

Context → assisted work → human review.

06

See our thinking in practice

Here’s a simplified example of how the same request can lead to different recommendations, depending on what we discover.

A founder says

“We need a new CRM.”

Select a finding to see how the recommendation changes.

What do we discover?
Customer data is scatteredTeams cannot see a reliable customer history across tools.One history?

What we discover

Teams cannot see a reliable customer history across tools.

Possible recommendation

Compare integrating existing systems, improving data ownership and replacing the CRM.

Illustrative example. A finding changes the next step.

07

What you actually receive

The output follows the problem—not the other way around. Depending on the engagement, you may leave with one or more of the following:

What the work leaves you withUseful artefacts. Built around the problem.
Clear problem statementThe issue, the context and the questions.

Clear problem statement

The issue, the context and the questions.

Prioritised opportunitiesA visible order for what matters.

Prioritised opportunities

A visible order for what matters.

Workflow mapOwnership and handoffs made explicit.

Workflow map

Ownership and handoffs made explicit.

Decision briefOptions, trade-offs and the next step.

Decision brief

Options, trade-offs and the next step.

Product roadmapThe sequence, rather than a feature pile.

Product roadmap

The sequence, rather than a feature pile.

Go-to-market planWho to reach, and how to approach them.

Go-to-market plan

Who to reach, and how to approach them.

Implementation supportDecisions that help work move forward.

Implementation support

Decisions that help work move forward.

Ongoing leadershipProduct judgment within the team.

Ongoing leadership

Product judgment within the team.

The output follows the problem, not the other way around.

08

What we believe—and what we don’t

Our working principlesAn examined decision beats an automatic answer.
We believeExamine the evidence and keep the recommendation open to change.

We believe

  • Understand the problem before proposing a solution
  • Examine evidence, people and business context
  • Compare alternatives and acknowledge trade-offs
  • Make decisions that teams can act on
  • Revisit decisions when new evidence appears
We don’t assumeDo not choose a solution before examining the situation.

We don’t assume

  • Every problem needs new software
  • More features automatically mean more value
  • The most sophisticated option is always best
  • A strategy document alone creates results
  • The first recommendation must always remain correct
Make the reasoning visible. Revisit it when the evidence changes.

You don’t need to arrive with a perfectly defined problem.

Sometimes you know exactly what isn’t working. Sometimes you only know that the next investment feels too important to get wrong.

We can start by understanding the situation together.

Discuss a Decision ↗
A useful first conversationYou bring the context. We work through it together.
Start by sharing the situationTwo people sit at the same working table and review a page of context. The conversation starts with what is happening, rather than a predetermined engagement.What is happening?Start with the situation.
The next step can be small. It needs to make sense.